http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09-modern-warfare/50040

 

obsolutely epic!

 

oh and this too

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/game/left-4-dead-2/11391

 

and splinter cell conviction: (sam fisher gone bad :O)

 

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09-splinter-cell/50012

Edited June 2, 200915 yr by mojito22

More of the same he most of being playing on piss easy because if that was hardcore he should have being dead like 15 times.

More of the same he most of being playing on piss easy because if that was hardcore he should have being dead like 15 times.

haha yeah i know, he obviously has no skill...hence why he plays it on xbox :wacko:

WOW l4d 2!

Wow I love the cinematic elements.. very well done on the part of the creative team.

Looks exactly like MW1 with totally linear gameplay & cutscenes. Oh well, at least it will provide a few hours of entertainment.

epic hard on for more zombie action

Looks exactly like MW1 with totally linear gameplay & cutscenes. Oh well, at least it will provide a few hours of entertainment.

linear gameplay isnt bad at all, just so long as it isnt a crap gameplay its all good

Wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! haha too many games im looking forward too soo little time.

Its fun, just gets boring when the enemies do the exact thing every time. The combat is all the same, just occasionally interupted by scripted events followed by more slow advancement through hordes of soldiers whose sole purpose in life is to get themselves killed and leap over walls.

 

Dont get me wrong its fun for a few levels but take missile silo level of MW1 for example, you just walk through identical compounds for ten minutes shooting at guys who all take up indentical positions around corners and patiently wait for you to come and kill them.

WOW l4d 2!

Am I the only one who sees this as a bad thing?

 

L4D was heaps of fun but ultimately it was very very light on content. It seems that instead of making a game that could stand the test of time they simply released a tech demo (L4D) so they could rake in some money while they worked on the actual full game (L4D2).

 

Why couldn't they simply make the original L4D much much better (more levels, weapons, enemies, etc), and then they could get to work on a proper sequel that would take maybe 2-3 years to make instead of releasing 2 games in 2 years which are actually more like a demo and the full game or a game and the expansion pack. Pretty shoddy ethics IMHO to do it as they have.

cod looks good, not my cup of tea. multiplayer may be a different story.

Love the cinematic elements of mw1 and I made a mess of my pants watching the e3 gameplay for mw2 (prolly dl it just for sp). I'm with Wolf on L4D2. I like it, but they ought to be fixing and perfecting no1 first. But new financial year, so they have to make some money.

 

Never played any of the Splinter Cell games. Recommendations?

they are pretty good, but since double agent they got worse and worse...im not sure how this new one is going to be, its a complete different style of gameplayin a way.

i came.

all though its CoD it is so good. Im lovin it!

Never played any of the Splinter Cell games. Recommendations?

 

Heard Caos Theory is probably the best of the series, but you can get double agent the lastest Splinter Cell game for the PC for about $5 US off Steam.

 

Gameplay for Conviction looks phwoar

 

http://splintercell.uk.ubi.com/conviction/#/extended_gameplay_reveal_video/

Edited June 2, 200915 yr by soulnsurf

they are pretty good, but since double agent they got worse and worse...im not sure how this new one is going to be, its a complete different style of gameplayin a way.

Indeed, I'm not sold on the new one it looks very very actiony and not very much like the other splinter cell games at all. In the other games if you got found and got shot at you were almost as good as dead. In this one he seems to eat bullets for breakfast.

 

As for the earlier games Splinter cell 1 had the best story IMHO. Pandora tomorrow was good too, chaos theory had great gameplay mechanics but the story is pretty retarded. Never ended up playing double agent for some reason, was it good?

Edited June 2, 200915 yr by mrchickenfool

concvition not on PS3 that sucks

Hmm did I mention.

 

[rant]

 

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD BIGGER MULTI PLAYER MAPS!

 

[/rant]

 

K thx bai!

what the hell was with the ice climbing intro?????? Seems like the makers just watched Vertical limit and thought that to be a good idea to incorporate ARGH!

Absolutely killed it for me along with linear style play and arcade shooting... suppose there is a reason i play pr!

It has been a long time since I played the last splinter cell and oh man that gameplay video got me pumped up for it. More actual 'gameplay' shown than that MW2 vid!

cod 4 didnt look to bad, but it think the arcade shooting look that bad cause it was on such an easy difficulty, im sure it would be a bit harder on Veteren

God damn people sensing radars... BF2 had it, so now just about every shooter out there has to have some sort of incomprehensively stupid "life sensor" or radar, spotter or UAV that can see every enemy on the map - no matter weather they're in a building, under a tank, or dancing naked on the rooftop - so MW2 now have a portable version mounted on a gun!

 

Nothing like removing the elements of chance, tactics and stealth. Truly what kills most shooters out there.

But the kids like it, Spectre. Won't you think about the children?

 

It's been the trend for the last 7 years or so, most games are suffering from the dumbing down ray.

 

 

What is more concerning is a SMS comp I saw on TV the other day. Question was a 2 answer mulitple choice. And the obvious answer was extremely obvious. A veiled attempt to make the kids think they are smart, sure to vote and make a tidy profit on the flagfalls.