Hi All,

 

I was cruising through the stats for Server 1 earlier and noticed some interesting anomalies. The Score Per Minute figure is a good one. We can draw a couple of very loose conclusions about players abilities and or playing styles from this - of course these conclusions won't apply to everyone and they only apply to players who have played more than a few hours on the server but still...

 

Score < 8 - either a conservative player or perhaps one with less experience

 

8 < Score < 11 - most of the regular players who are pretty good

 

11 < Score < 14 - either damned good players or else big risk takers in-game (or armour players).

 

OK - no great surprises there. A low score doesn't mean the player is a newb, they might have a conservative playing style or else they might be an Engineer specialist or something.

 

Scan through the list, though, and you see a handful of players with SPM off the scale, including one guy at 24+. Now, statistically that might be a fluke if he only played one round and had a blinder but there are a number of other players with scores >15 who I would characterise as "blow ins".

 

I wonder if the SPM might not be useful as a pointer to us on who to watch out for, umm, shall we say less than squeaky clean software installations?

I had a quick look. The people with the high SPM only had play times of less than 2 hours. PR's high scores + low play time = high SPM. It's expected.

12.3 here for server 1. Only a couple people higher than me on first page of 50. Wheres my prize?

 

On a more serious note - it really depends on what you do..you get a lot of points as a SL, which is what I am mainly doing. Building assets and sitting on a flag defending it get you a tonne of points as opposed to driving people around in a chopper you'll only get a few points for the transportation.

eh, SPM means nothing, all stats can be thrown out of contexts with many variables, time being a big one.

 

judge the player, not the stats

Agree with Daveee.

 

Though if you want to gauge how good a player is from their stats I find it is better to find out their kills and deaths as well as score.

 

Some conclusions I have made from in game match by match scores:

 

High kills + high deaths = risk taker, front line assaulter.

 

Low kills + low deaths = Conservative player, Defense oriented.

 

High kills + low deaths = Above average player or having a good match.

 

Low kills + high deaths = Below average player or having a bad match.

 

High overall score = team oriented, medic, builder, leader.

 

Low overall score = new to game or not team oriented.

 

Looking at a players persistent stats:

 

Higher SPM usually points to a more team oriented player.

 

Higher KDR usually points to a better shooter/frontline soldier.

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d133/80_Russians/Buergerwehr-2.jpg

 

Aw, people can come up with statistics to prove anything, Kent. Forfty percent of all people know that!

You don't honestly expect me to post in here..........do you???

 

 

:P

score Per minute means nothing....some people play commander every game...and they get massive points....so it doesnt even out.

 

Even i think the scoring system is lame....but hey im No1 so ill brag while i can, until someone just cains me cause they whore up the commander possy.

lol yes ok KllrKirk , I wish I had no family so I could play as much as you boy . hehehehehe cya in game

score Per minute means nothing....some people play commander every game...and they get massive points....so it doesnt even out.

 

Even i think the scoring system is lame....but hey im No1 so ill brag while i can, until someone just cains me cause they whore up the commander possy.

 

we gave the commandos a good spanking last night lol .:elf:

just had a look at stats and im 5th.

but most of my score come from comm i think. o well im still 5th

I'm 281st.

Ohhhhhh yeah.

commando's is only up wen i have at least 3 ppl i trust in my squad lol.

Otherwise the squad and name get smashed.

 

GG the champsky u guys did a really good job of assault's

No one rushed in u all communicated and moved as a group.

Lol I remember alot of rounds lately where I may have only been in 1 or 2 firefights in the whole hour or so. Yes, playing a bit conservative lately, PR just doesn't give me that high anymore unless I'm sneaking behind enemy lines.

ok where do i find these stats?

http://www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.13.37.40:16568/top_players/

 

I think they're talking about here.

 

score Per minute means nothing....some people play commander every game...and they get massive points....so it doesnt even out.

 

Even i think the scoring system is lame....but hey im No1 so ill brag while i can, until someone just cains me cause they whore up the commander possy.

 

Exactly I have 15.8 yet i'm sure everyone knows i'm not that good.

Good is a relative term.

 

Sure you might suck at shooting people, but if you can get a decent score as a commander it means you're doing a good job at that and ultimately helping your team which actually makes you a good player.

play your strengths..

 

commanding might be your go..

 

or simply providing transport, or being a mobile mechanic for your armour

 

 

it all helps the team.. and i would rather have a team full of these types of people then a team full of rambos.

play your strengths..

 

commanding might be your go..

 

or simply providing transport, or being a mobile mechanic for your armour

 

 

it all helps the team.. and i would rather have a team full of these types of people then a team full of rambos.

 

+1.